Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Reactivity Coefficients

The title sounds too technical?
Hmm.. it is just a title after all..
This blog is designed to be fun!
Turning technicals into something that is easy to be digest by the majorities.

Ever heard of Chernobyl accident?
Chernobyl Power Plant located in Ukraine (Soviet Union at that time) was hit by disaster in 1986.
One of the reactor exploded and cause major catastrophe.
The accident is said to be caused by the combinations of the design and operating characteristics of the reactor and human error.
Yeah, human do make mistake.

Chernobyl reactor have a feature known as Positive Reactivity Feedback.
When the output power increase, the temperature and multiplication factor increase.
In short, Positive Reactivity Feedback Effect enhances the effect that produced it and is destabilizing.

The RBMK reactor design used at chernobyl is a pressurized water cooled reactor which uses boiling water as the coolant and using graphite as its moderator.
It is very different from most other power reactors in the world, as it is derived from a design that produce both plutonium and power generation.
When the coolant water temperature increase, the boiling increase, which creates voids.
In RBMK reactor, the void coefficient is positive thus making it less stable.
As the accident showed, positive void coefficient is fairly unsafe.
Major modifications have been made to RBMK reactors to solve these problems.
The last unit of reactor at Chernobyl were still used until the year 2000.

As for now, there is nothing to worry about.
The flawed design characteristics of the RBMK reactor is seen as one of several cause of Chernobyl accident.
Those were 1970s design reactors after all. :)

Reactors design nowadays is far more safer!




Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Difference between a Nuclear Reactor and a Nuclear Bomb

Image from Google
Image from Google
 You know the difference? 
Alright, the main difference between both of them is the rate of energy it released.
In a nuclear reactor, energy is released at a controllable rate. 
While in a nuclear weapon, energy is released at a very high and uncontrollable rate.

Or in other words, in a nuclear reactor, the nuclear chain reaction is kept at a level to be just barely self-sustaining. In a bomb, the chain reaction accelerates rapidly until the energy produces causes the assembly to fly apart.


Do you know?
Today, as the main nuclear arsenals are being dismantled and a comprehensive test ban treaty is in sight, commercial nuclear power provides 14 percent of the world's electricity. Several factors suggest that nuclear power has a much larger role to play in supplying the world's future energy needs.


References:-
  • http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2001-05/988836248.Ph.r.html
  • http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf52.html
  • http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy99/phy99554.htm





Monday, September 27, 2010

Nuclear For Peace, Nuclear For Malaysia :)

Assalamualaikum and Salam Sejahtera.
First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to everyone who accidentally, or purposely come across to read this blog.
This blog is mainly about the Nuclear Power Plant Development in Malaysia.

Whether you like it or not, Malaysia is in need for a larger generating capacity Power Plant.
As fossil fuels are depleting, building a Power Plant that rely on fossil fuel is not an intellect idea. And it also emits huge amount of toxic and hazardous emission.

Renewable Energy? Well, Nuclear is a renewable energy actually. :)
Why? hmm, I can't tell everything in this very first post right?
So, to know more, remember to bookmark this blog and remember to read it daily.

Once again, Thank You.
;)

P/s: kindly click on the Like! button if you find this entry interesting. Your help and kind attention is highly appreciated.